Archive | Healthcare RSS feed for this section

The Well Being Index

I find this to be an interesting study (the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index). Gallup and Healthways are surveying 1,000 people per day for 350 days per year and has been doing it for several years.

I was reading one of their brochures looking at data from 1/2/10 – 12/30/10. Here’s a few observations:

  • The index score across all states varies by a narrow range of 9.3 points.
  • The top 5 states (in 2010) were:
    • Hawaii
    • Wyoming
    • North Dakota
    • Alaska
    • Colorado
  • The top 5 large cities were:
    • Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
    • Austin-Round Rock, TX
    • San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
    • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
    • San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA

The overall composite score is based on six sub-indices:

  • Life Evaluation
    • Partially based on the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale
  • Emotional Health
    • A composite of how the consumer felt yesterday along nine dimensions
  • Physical Health
    • Body Mass Index
    • Disease burden
    • Sick days
    • Physical pain
    • Daily energy
    • History of disease
    • Daily health experiences
  • Healthy Behavior
    • Life style habits
  • Work Environment
    • Feelings and perceptions about work
  • Basic Access
    • 13 items measuring:
      • Access to food
      • Access to shelter
      • Access to healthcare
      • Having a safe and satisfying place to live

This gives an interesting macro view of healthcare at a localized level. The thing I’d like to learn is how this is shaping communities and health care entities to act different. Is this changing engagement strategies? Is this changing regional investments? Can the data be tied back to individuals and used to help improve outcomes?

Comments On Prescription Copay Article

In preparation for my presentation on copay cards at the PCMA event on Wednesday, I read Mason Tenaglia’s article in Pharmaceutical Executive called “Letting the Facts Get in the Way“. I think it’s a good article from the manufacturer perspective to discuss copay cards. (You can see comments from Adam Fein here.) Perhaps if Mason and Visante could get together and share data we might actually have a full perspective of the marketplace.

Mason’s article is a frontal attack on the Visante paper on the topic that talks about copay cards increasing costs by $32B over the next 10 years (which by the way is less than $1 per Rx over that time period). But, I’m not sure it really clears up the debate for me. Let me discuss a few points.

  • He talks about the APLD (Anonymous Patient Longitudinal Data) from Wolters Kluwer which can identify secondary payers. And, it can tell you if they were new to therapy, changed therapy, or simply were continuing therapy when they used the cards. This sounds great since everyone I’ve ever talked to said they can’t get to this data.
  • He proposes that the Lipitor $4 program to extend the brand after a chemically equivalent generic is available is more an anomaly than a standard program. Perhaps. While I agree that the focus of many cards is in specialty (51% according to his estimate), if the Lipitor program works (still TBD), why wouldn’t others jump on board (which would likely increase costs to payers).
  • He proposes that copay cards be used for Medicare Part D members (which most people tells me already happens). He also says that they’re the least adherent which is probably true based on total number of prescriptions which has been shown to correlate with lower adherence (not really their insurance).
  • He states that most copay cards are used for Tier 2 (formulary) medications. It makes me wonder why the manufacturers pay rebates and use copay cards…which he alludes to in his article.
  • He states that formulary access is attributed to marketshare which I think is true in a world of “me-too” products, but if products have new clinical value and better outcomes, they can get placed on a formulary without marketshare.
  • He states that copay cards won’t drive up costs in Part D because over ½ of the utilization of brand drugs is by low-income patients where they won’t need a copay card for their $6.60 average copay. I personally disagree. I think that’s a red herring as this group is very price sensitive.
  • Without giving away too much of my presentation for Wednesday (which I’ll post the slides and summary that day), he makes a key point but without the key data. “Combined medical and pharmacy costs in Medicare for oncology, rheumatology, and MS might actually be lower as a result of compliant patients.” The key word here is might. While I (like many) believe this to be true, I don’t think there are studies to support this. I agree that IF copay cards could demonstrate improved adherence AND that adherence could demonstrate lower medical costs and better outcomes THEN we would be having a different discussion.

It’s an interesting area. I’ll share a lot more thoughts on Wednesday, but I think Mason’s article is a good one for discussion on the topic.

90 Day Rxs Get Better Adherence

I think we can all agree now that 90-day prescriptions are correlated with better adherence (and the percentage of retail 90-day scripts is going up).  The latest study here is from Walgreens.

A new Walgreens study analyzing relative medication adherence of patients filling 90-day supplies of maintenance medications using retail and mail order channels over a one-year period concluded that patients who fill prescriptions via retail have as high or slightly higher adherence levels than those utilizing mail (77 percent vs. 76 percent). The study, “Medication Adherence for 90-Day Quantities of Medication Dispensed Through Retail and Mail Order Pharmacies,” was recently released in the November issue of The American Journal of Managed Care.

This reflects other studies from CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Kaiser, and BCBSNC.  (Although sometimes it shows mail order as better and sometimes retail.)

Of course, the data is slightly different in either case, but the general consensus is the same.  So, the question is what’s next.  How should you compare the two channels?

  • Generic fill rate
  • Overall health literacy and health outcomes
  • Patient experience / satisfaction
  • Payer cost
  • Cost to fill

This issue won’t go away so it’s going to be important to continue to find ways to compare the channels and find populations that are similar for comparison or remove the bias.

 

Rock Health Report on Digital Health

I saw this out on Slideshare, and I thought I would share it here.

NYT Article On ACOs Replacing Health Insurers

I think it’s a bold (maybe foolish) prediction that is made in the NY Times article saying that ACOs (Accountable Care Organizations) will be the end of health insurers.  We don’t even know that ACOs will work yet.  You can even see some debate on this topic in this blog post on Why ACOs Won’t Work.

But, I’m not an ACO expert so let me focus on what I found interesting in the NYT article.  It points out a few things:

  1. The focus on preventative care
  2. The fact that some managed care organizations are changing (and others will too)
  3. The fact that “ACOs” (in whatever form they take) will need a platform

This is what I find interesting.

I think the concept of an ACO (or Patient Centered Medical Home) where care becomes localized and there is greater focus on prevention and wellness not just sick-care is great.  We should all want that to happen in some form.

But, in all cases, this changes the data needs and role of the physician.  They need to be empowered with new information and tools.  How do they manage their panel of diabetics?  Will some database track them and monitor their screenings and blood sugar?

When the field of medicine is constantly changing with new drugs and new studies, how will physicians have the best practices pulled into their practice?  They won’t want to wait the 16 years it takes for things to work their way through the system.  They’ll actually want to embrace the best solutions and see more comparative effectiveness information.

I see a huge opportunity here for someone to create an ACO “platform” that embeds business rules, tele-monitoring, consumer engagement, and reporting into a way to create the “i-physician” (informed physician) of the future.

Medicare Enrollment Up 1.2M (9.5%) in 2012

Based on new data from CMS as shared by CSFB in a report, the enrollment in Medicare Advantage through January 12th is up 1.2M to 13.3M.  This is 27% penetration into the Medicare market.  PDP enrollment was up to 19.69M a similar gain of 1.2M. 

A quick summary of the big winners are:

  • For Medicare Advantage (by percentage)
    • Humana +13.5%
    • Amerigroup +13.3%
    • Coventry +12.2%
  • For Medicare Advantage (by membership)
    • Humana +262K
    • United +132K
    • Aetna +35K
  • For PDP (by percentage)
    • Coventry +25.3%
    • Cigna +14.8%
    • Humana +12.3%
  • For PDP (by membership)
    • Humana +312K
    • Coventry +291K
    • Cigna +80K

This is also interesting in light of Kermit Crawford (CEO of Walgreens) comment yesterday:

“Based on our preliminary analysis of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data, Medicare Part D plans with Walgreens in their network gained market share in the aggregate, while those without Walgreens lost market share. Importantly, we were very pleased to see that those plans that included Walgreens grew nearly twice as fast as those Medicare Part D plans without Walgreens. In fact, several health plans that partnered with Walgreens grew significantly faster. For example, Coventry, who partnered with Walgreens and introduced a low cost Medicare Part D option, grew five times faster than the overall market.”

The one obvious account that he’s talking about is Wellpoint which lost 2,000 (0.3%) members in MA and 73,000 (11.6%) members in PDP.

Uping The RxAnte: An Adherence Predictive Model

Those of you that have heard me speak know that I look at this topic of predicting adherence both from an area of fascination along with the eye of a skeptic.  While I love the concept of predicting someone’s adherence and therefore determining how to best support them from an intervention approach, I also believe that the general predictors are pretty straightforward:

  1. Number of medications
  2. Plan design (i.e., cost)
  3. Gender
  4. Health literacy and engagement (see PAM score research)

And, this is a hot topic (see post on FICO adherence score).  You can see my prior posts on some different studies, on the Merck Estimator, and some notes from the NEHI event on this topic.  It generated a good dialogue on Kevin MD’s blog when I talked about paying MD for adherence.

I had a chance to talk with Josh Benner the CEO of RxAnte the other day.  It sounds very interesting, and they have an impressive team assembled.  In general, they’re focused on:

  • Predictive modeling
  • Decision rules
  • Monitoring and managing claims to track adherence
  • Evaluating effectiveness of interventions
  • And creating a learning system

There are definitely some correlations to the work we do at Silverlink Communications around adherence.  We’re helping clients determine a communication strategy that might include call center agents, direct mail, automated calls, e-mail, SMS, mobile, or web solutions.  We’re looking at segmentation and prioritization.  We’re looking at past behavior and messaging.  The goal is how to best spend resources to drive health outcomes from primary adherence to sustaining adherence.  This is a challenge, and we all need to build upon the work that each other is doing to improve in this area.  We have a huge problem globally with adherence.

Why People Under 35 Are Stressed

This is a great list from what Beth Braverman calls “The Beaten Generation” looking at what’s happened since 2005:

  • Their home equity has dropped 51%
  • Their net worth is down 55%.
  • Their student debt is up 19%.
  • Unemployment for college grads is up 64%.
  • Their income is down 4.5%
  • 31% more are living with their parents.
  • The birth rate is down 7.1%.
  • 22% less think they’ll be able to retire by age 65.

And, we wonder why they’re pessimistic…

Stressed Out Workers Spend 2X On Healthcare

Are you stressed out? In today’s economy, many people are. Whether it’s being a caregiver, your job, or other concerns (like just paying the bills), have you ever thought about how much that costs you?

According to some data shared by Money Magazine, here are some examples of stress related ailments and their average annual costs:

  • Obesity – $2,600-$4,900
  • Back Pain – $1,300
  • Insomnia – $200-$1,200
  • Hypertension – $1,100
  • Teeth Grinding – $200-$1,100

That’s real money!

Some of their suggestions (other than going on a long vacation):

  1. Take advantage of the EAP (Employee Assistance Program) that your company might offer.
  2. Use the wellness programs that your employer might offer (since 74% of them do offer something).
  3. Go see a therapist and look into CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy).
  4. Workout.
  5. Take a break from e-mail (or your smartphone and constant Facebook updates).
  6. Stop multi-tasking.
  7. Meditate.

(Beat Stress For Less by Kate Ashford)

Be Happier To Be Healthier

Since happiness is correlated with better health, I thought this article in Money Magazine was relevant in the hints it gave about becoming happier. (Jan/Feb 2012 article by Donna Rosato)

  1. Spend a little a lot of the time. (multiple, small indulgences are better than less, large indulgences)
  2. Free yourself from credit card debt. (less satisfied in your relationship when have debt)
  3. Focus on having a rainy day fund. (best predictor of financial satisfaction)
  4. Find a new job. (if you’re not happy)
  5. Give more to charity.
  6. Use your vacation days. (even anticipation of a vacation increases happiness)

Here are a few more articles on happiness and health:

The New Post-Recession Consumer

I’m always fascinated by segmentation, and I think understanding how market events like the Great Recession have changed the fundamentals of the game is important. In November 2011, Money Magazine shared some data from a survey they did. Here are some of the results.

  • 53% of Americans aren’t sure their kids will better off then they are.
  • 67% are worked their quality of life will suffer in retirement.
  • 80% say they’re eating at home more.
  • 75% say time with family is more important than ever.

“Big periods of economic upheaval can define a generation. Not so much because of the depth of this recession, but because of its prolonged nature, it will have lasting impact.” Paul Flatters, Managing Director of Trajectory Partnership. (How The Economy Changed You by Dan Kadlec)

  • 85% spend more time looking for deals before they buy. (hence the couponing craze)
  • 57% are building an emergency fund.
  • 51% are pessimistic about the US economy in the next 12 months.
  • 61% are pessimistic about government officials spurring growth.

I don’t know about you, but I see a ton of nuggets in here about positioning generic drugs, preventative health, adherence, mail order, and many other cost savings actions in healthcare.

52% Of Patients Who Had A Second Opinion Had Changes

I don’t know about you, but this seems a little surprising to me. We know that it’s hard to figure everything out in the 8-15 minutes we have with the physician so perhaps a deep focus on key claims and key procedures is a necessary process. But, I think many of us worry that our physician will think we don’t trust them.

“Someone who has your best interest in mind will welcome that conversation.” Is what Dr. Jeffrey Cain, president-elect of the American Academy of Family Physicians says about telling your physician that you’re getting a second opinion

So, according to an article in Money Magazine, here’s what you do:

  1. Check your coverage. You may be covered if you get a second opinion. If not, you might be able to appeal that decision.
  2. Find the right doctor. The article suggests getting multiple names and finding MDs that work at different hospitals (to avoid group think).
  3. Get your documents together. Make sure the physician has all the documentation before you go or bring it with you.

(Get More From A Second Opinion by Anne Lee)

Why Use Facial Recognition Software At The Pharmacy…Retention?

I’m sure this is a little bit out there in terms of some of my ideas, but I like it. While a little Orwellian, I was talking with a retailer the other day about how to maximize the experience at the counter between the patient and the pharmacist. At a small independent pharmacy, the owner (pharmacist) probably knows a lot of this patients (customers) by name. On the other hand, this is a lot harder at the larger chains which are busier and with multiple pharmacists working different shifts.

I was thinking about how technology could address this. What if you had a camera that was monitoring customers as they came in the store (which most probably have today in terms of security cameras)? Could that be augmented by adding facial recognition software (which I have no idea how expensive it is)? Then, the pharmacy could know that George was in the store and tap into a CRM system that could remind Nancy the pharmacist that I have a dog and a fear of needles (for example). When I got to the counter, Nancy could greet me by name and ask about my dog. It would certainly make me feel welcome and should create some stickiness (although maybe less if I knew it was technology enabled).

Pharmacy Needs A Neuromarketing Study

I was reading this article in Fast Company about neuromarketing with a focus on the CEO of NeuroFocus. Companies like PepsiCo, Intel, CBS, ESPN, and eBay have used them and many others are trying work in this area. But, I’ve never heard of a healthcare company doing anything in this space. I’ve talked about this before in my article about the book Buyology. It’s fascinating, and the mobile tool that NeuroFocus has created could create new ways of capturing data.

One interesting example he talked about was the expression of a person on a poster (for example). If the expression is too easy to decipher, we simply move on…BUT if it’s hard to decipher, it causes us to pause and think.

He also talks about always putting images on the left hand side of the screen and words on the right. (Seems applicable to direct mail and maybe my next slide presentation.)

Another example is that the brain loves curves not sharp edges.

Given the shifting pharmacy marketplace, I would think this is a study that the industry needs. The PBMs should better understand what the consumer thinks about when they hear the word mail order. Manufacturers should understand the reaction to brand names or copay cards. The retailers should think about how brand equity plays into choice. There are endless opportunities here. (A business opportunity perhaps!)

(They Have Hacked Your Brain by Adam Penenberg)

Percentage You Pay For Prescriptions In Medicare

I thought this was a nice summary which Money shared based on CMS data. It shows you what percentage of cost for your prescriptions you pay based on total dollars spent on prescriptions during that calendar year.

  • For the first $320, you pay 100% of the costs.
  • For the next $2,610, you pay 25% of the costs.
  • For the next $3,727 (the donut hole), you pay 50% of the costs for the brand drugs and 86% of the costs of the generic drugs.
  • For everything above $6,658, you pay 5% of the costs.

Why A Big Mac And Coke Is Your Diet Meal

In an interesting study and other work, there appears to be a health halo effect which happens. We’re all familiar with Jared (from Subway) and his amazing weight loss journey. But, this leads us to perceive that the sandwich’s there are all low calorie…even though a lot of us order the 12″ sandwich. In one study, people eating at Subway had 56% more calories than people ordering at McDonalds. SCARY!

You add that to the perception that many people have that a diet soda is better than a regular soda, and you have an interesting problem. Of course, the best problem is to pick healthier foods and understand their calories. Of course, even when restaurants began sharing how many calories were in their meals that simply got people to consume more calories not less. And, a USA Today article points out that the listed calories don’t always match the actual calories (and not in a good way).

Good luck figuring it out.

Wellpoint Quote On Drug Copay Cards

This topic seems to be heating back up based on several posts on Adam Fein’s blog (Lipitor, adherence) and an article in Drug Benefit News where this quote appeared along with an AIS blog post questioning the PBM’s dislike of copay cards (from the same article that Adam mentioned).

“Copay offset programs [offered by brand-name drugmakers to compete with generics] mitigate the effectiveness of our tiered benefit design programs and [are] going against what we’re trying to accomplish for our members’ health and for employers.”

— Peter Clagett, vice president of pharmaceutical strategies and PBM oversight for WellPoint, Inc.

 

Customer Centric Segmentation

An article by this name appeared in the September 2011 PharmaVOICE magazine. I think it reinforced several things that are part of my evangelizing when I’m out on the road talking to healthcare companies. I pulled out a few comments and quotes that reinforce many of the things that I think about.

  • “Pharmaceutical companies need to develop tools and techniques that touch patients and physicians as they move along the disease journey together.” Derek Kealey
  • “Segmentation creates the ability to treat consumers as people, not transactions.” (article author)
  • “Insights into breast cancer patients reveal that adherence has little to do with age or stage of the disease and everything to do with how a person copes with the condition.” Jeff Burkel
  • “The key to successful messaging isn’t so much about finding target customers; it’s about using search marketing to make it easy for them to find you and ideally start a relationship.” Wendy White
  • “The industry’s business model has to morph from being about a pill to being about information and services around the pill.” Dr. Joseph Kvedar
  • “The big change will be moving beyond the siloed view and looking across all channels and understanding how every outlet can work together holistically.” Derek Kealey
  • Pharma needs to focus on the user experience and understand what the consumer needs and how to service it up to them. (paraphrased from Wendy Blackburn)

Adam Fein From Last Year’s PCMA Event On Copay Cards

Just revisiting what Adam Fein talked about last year as I work on my slides for this year. 

How Does Pharma Measure ROI?

I found this chart from Cutting Edge Information a good summary of what metrics pharma uses in measuring ROI.  (This was in the most recent PharmaVOICE magazine.)  I would assume copay cards address most of these with a 4:1-6:1 ROI being quoted in the Visante study by PCMA

Walgreens Interview As Follow-up To Their White Paper

As anyone who follows the pharmacy industry knows (and now millions of consumers), Walgreens and Express Scripts have had an ongoing contract dispute since mid-2011.  Most of us expected this to get resolved by the end of the year to minimize patient disruption, but it didn’t.

With that in mind, Walgreens has published several white papers to help articulate the results of their employer survey data and to help plans quantify the value of keeping Walgreens in the network.  As this is a fascinating case study that will someday make a great Harvard case study, I reached out to Walgreens to get their thoughts on a few points.

Thanks to their PR team, I was able to get responses from Michael Polzin, their VP of Corporate Communications, to my questions.

Consumers are always resistant to change.  After the initial disruption and assuming you eventually reach terms with Express Scripts, how will you get your consumers to return to Walgreens’ pharmacy?  Is the retail pharmacy experience able to be significantly differentiated?  How are you doing this today?

As we’ve previously stated, we are now moving on without being part of the Express Scripts network. While we are open to any fair and competitive offer from them, we also are fine with continuing to operate our business without Express Scripts.

We intend to retain patients affected by this situation over time by reaching out on both a consumer level and a business-to-business level. To date, more than 120 health plans, employers and other Express Scripts clients have informed us that they have either changed pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) or taken steps consistent with their contracts to maintain access to Walgreens pharmacies in 2012.  That represents 10 million of the 88 million Express Scripts prescriptions we filled last year. We’re also in active negotiations with many health plans and employers to provide access to Walgreens in their networks as soon as their contracts allow. In addition to those 10 million prescriptions already retained, we also expect to retain many Medicare Part D patients who previously were in an Express Scripts-managed Part D plan and moved to a different plan during last fall’s open enrollment period. We will get more detail on those numbers when CMS announces the results of the open enrollment period later this month.

On the consumer level, they are very receptive to looking at options to continue using Walgreens pharmacies whenever possible. They want to retain their choice of pharmacy and are exercising that ability as best they can. For example, we’ve had great response this month with our Prescription Savings Club (PSC) promotion. The PSC offers savings on more than 8,000 brand name and all generic medications. During the month of January, you can get an annual membership in this program for just $5 ($10 for a family).  We have seen more than 250,000 patients sign up for the club just since Jan. 1, and we continue to have record sign-up days. The interest we’ve seen in the club has been extraordinary.

As for differentiating the retail pharmacy experience, that is exactly what we are doing through our new Well Experience store format, which has piloted so far in about 20 Chicago area stores and the entire Indianapolis market. The pharmacy, health and wellness area of these stores are truly a game changer. The pharmacist is more accessible by bringing them out from behind the pharmacy counter to a desk in front of the pharmacy. As a result, patient interactions are higher than our pharmacists have ever experienced. The format also allows for tighter integration between our Take Care Clinic nurse practitioners and pharmacists to create a real community health corner.

We’ve had many CEOs of major health plans and large employers tour these Well Experience stores, and their No. 1 comment is, “This is exactly what we need. How fast can you make this happen?”

The white papers are good summaries for the consultants. How are you taking your message to other constituents – consumers, MDs, Wall Street?

Our best ambassadors to consumers are our pharmacy staffs. They are the ones with the trusted relationship with our customers and are able to have individual, face-to-face conversations with them. They’ve done a tremendous job educating our patients, and that’s why we’re seeing so much interest in the PSC and have patients finding other ways to continue using Walgreens, such as using their spouse’s coverage, if available.

The same is true with physicians. Our pharmacy staff work with them every day and help them find the best options for their patients including generic alternatives that can be very competitive through the PSC card with a 90-day supply compared with the patient’s program under Express Scripts.

As for Wall Street, we’ve been quite active speaking at analyst conferences, addressing the issue on our earnings conference calls and at our recent annual shareholders meeting. The analysts also have found our white papers and other SEC filings to be helpful in understanding the situation.

Ultimately, payers/employers care about cost.  If a PBM creates savings for them thru a limited network, can you summarize what they lose by not including Walgreens and how that transfers to hard dollar savings?  Are Walgreens consumers more engaged with their health?  Are they more satisfied with their healthcare?

Our research demonstrates the importance of Walgreens presence in a payers’ network in addition to the cost factor. A Walgreens proprietary survey conducted in December of 823 executives and managers who are key decision makers for pharmacy benefit decisions or provide input found that 82 percent of employers said that they would not exclude Walgreens for less than 5 percent savings on their total pharmacy spend. Sixty percent of employers would not exclude Walgreens for less than 10 percent savings, and 21 percent would not exclude Walgreens from their network regardless of the amount of savings. These findings on employer attitudes are consistent with recent research published by several leading equity research analysts. Clearly, employers value having Walgreens as a pharmacy option for their employees, but Express Scripts wants to take that choice away.

Now, add to that the small variation in costs among pharmacies. We believe that the vast majority of pharmacies, including Walgreens, receive reimbursements per prescription that fall within a narrow band, typically within less than 5 percent of one another. Therefore, excluding any pharmacy with our 20 percent market share from a 5 percent pricing band can only result in savings on the order of 1 percent or less. And that doesn’t take into consideration the additional savings Walgreens can provide through our leading generic dispensing rate or the 7 percent savings that payers can see by adding a 90-day refill option at our retail pharmacies.

It’s also important to point out that during negotiations, Walgreens offered to hold rates for a new contract flat and did not seek an increase in rates. The response from Express Scripts was to insist on being able to unilaterally define contract terms, such as what does and does not constitute a brand and generic drug. Express Scripts also proposed to slash Walgreens reimbursement rates to levels below the industry average cost to provide each prescription.

Walgreens is focused on helping payers with their total health care spend, not just the 10-12 percent of their health care costs that are spent on prescription drugs. While a patient with asthma can lower drug spend by not getting refills on their medication, the resulting emergency room visit that could result will be much more expensive overall for the payer. So we are focused on expanding the pharmacist’s role among health care providers to lower overall medical costs rather than focusing on drug spend alone.

Adherence is a big issue these days especially in Medicare where it is one of the key Star measures for PDP. One of the key value points in the paper is about adherence. How has Walgreens improved patient adherence and are you collaborating with payers to do this?

Walgreens pharmacies provide many medication adherence services, counseling and other assistance that lowers medical costs by improving outcomes. These include monthly adherence calls to inform patients about critical upcoming blood tests that are required to continue therapy; next-day home delivery for medications; assistance programs to help patients minimize risk resulting from economic circumstances that may negatively impact therapy compliance; and alerts for missed doses, at-risk patient behavior or serious adverse side effects that are communicated to a prescribing physician. We also offer 90-day supplies of medication, further promoting adherence. Walgreens pharmacists have consistently demonstrated increased adherence to chronic medicines for high-risk conditions for the populations that we serve. For example, for patients in one study who filled their statin and thyroid medications at community pharmacies and who consulted with a pharmacist, a significant improvement in first refill rates resulted (from 55.7 percent to 70.4 percent) after the adherence program was implemented.

While CVS has opted to own a PBM, Walgreens has sold their PBM.  Has this experience with Express Scripts changed the way you interact and contract with PBMs?  Do you think this will have broader implications on the industry?

I think it has helped us tremendously in terms of building closer relationships with other PBMs and payers. We’re moving forward with partners such as Catalyst Rx, Prime Therapeutics and SXC Health Solutions, and health plans such as Coventry and Humana. All of us see this as an opportunity to create a differentiated offering during the upcoming selling season.

Have any PBMs stepped up to work more strategically with you to create a differentiated offering to take advantage of this disruption during the 2012 selling season?

See answer above.

What’s next?  As Walgreens looks to the future and focuses on creating new value, how are you embracing key changes in the industry around health reform and technology innovation?

See question 1 and our development of the Well Experience store and pharmacy format.

Speaking at the upcoming PCMA Event

I just got added to the agenda for the February PCMA event so look me up if you’ll be there.  I’ve spoken on the topic of copay cards a few times for AIS in the past.  Since then, there have been a few significant events:

  • The Pfizer Lipitor strategy and push around a copay card.
  • The PCMA study on the impact of copay cards.
  • CVS Caremark’s changes to their formulary of which some were attributed to the existence of copay cards.

As always, I welcome comments, articles, suggestions, or data to support this discussion.  It is certainly one where there is limited data or facts.  Thanks.

“Twight” (Twitter Fight) Between $ESRX and $WAG

This is either a massive validation of the perceived value of Twitter or a crazy distraction, but either way, it’s interesting to those of us who study the industry and/or study marketing and communications. 

As part of the ongoing dispute between Walgreens and Express Scripts, Twitter has become one of the latest tools.  (see June post and September post)  In an effort to sway public opinion and thereby pressure Express Scripts and its clients, Walgreens turned to bloggers and Twitter to push their messaging…but these were in some case paid comments which was surprising.  They already have strong messaging in their IChooseWalgreens website and whitepapers on the Value of Walgreens.  I also thought they were demonstrating some success in converting people to their discount program which was part of their overall growth strategy shared at their shareholders meeting

After Walgreens (with almost 84,000 followers) created a promoted hashtag of #ILoveWalgreens, Express Scripts (with 1,645 followers) countered back with several Tweets about the dispute (see below).  I guess the question is whether with millions affected and decisions made by the businesses and not consumers…does this forum matter?  But, journalists and analysts follow them so it’s important to keep the messaging up.  (Other articles on this are here, here, and here.)

Conveniently, I found this infographic on how Twitter is changing healthcare.  At the same time, this is an interesting fight because it’s a blend of B2C and B2B crossing paths.  More to come since I’m sure this fight is long from over.

United HealthGroup At CES – Two Videos

This is Dr. Crounse from Microsoft talking about worldwide healthcare and using technology.

This is Dr. Reed Tuckson from United Healthcare talking about creating cost effective healthcare leveraging technology.

Who’s the 1% in healthcare?

As we all have known, healthcare costs are driven by the minority. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the top 1% account for 22% of healthcare spending in the US or about $90,000 per year. (USA Today article)

So, what are the characteristics of these people:
- White, non-Hispanic
- Female
- In poor health
- Elderly
- Users of publicly funded healthcare

Only about 20% of the high cost consumers stay in that bucket for two straight years…which I think is good. But, I guess you have to look at what percentage die during that period since a lot of costs are concentrated at the end-of-life.

Obviously it’s critical to develop solutions to engage and manage these patients earlier in the process. As data gets better, our predictive algorithms around conditions will improve and we’ll be able to intervene and prevent or delay cost in the system. The key of course is doing that in a way that fully engages the healthcare team and the caregivers.

Only 2 of the top 25 “Companies for Leaders” from Healthcare

I don’t know about you but given the focus on healthcare and the percentage of our GDP that it consumes I had hoped this would be higher. 

According to Fortune’s rankings (published 11/21/11), the top 5 companies were:

  1. IBM
  2. General Mills
  3. P&G
  4. Colgate-Palmolive
  5. McDonald’s

Eli Lilly was ranked 12th, and UnitedHealth Group was ranked 20th.

Medicare and Medicaid Social Media Use For Healthcare

As people look at ways to engage the Medicare and Medicaid populations, I continue to talk about the facts from the Pew research that shows how these demographics use technology.  I was glad to see some research from PWC that also reinforced this.  As you can see in the three charts below, the Medicare population uses technology similar to the average respondent while the Medicaid population uses social media for healthcare more. 

Mouthguards For Non-Contact Sports

I wore a mouthguard when I played lacrosse, but I’m not sure I could see myself putting in a mouthguard for running or playing tennis or golf.  Under Armour is pushing a series of mouthguards for any sport now (see brochure).  But, from a purely academic perspective, it’s interesting.

The material says that:

  • It improves airflow.
  • It reduces stress.
  • It improves strength.
  • It reduces lactic build-up.
  • It improves response time.
  • It reduces cortisol production.

It just makes me think that you’ll create this casual athlete with:

  • A mouthguard.
  • Nose strips to improve breathing.
  • Dark compression socks pulled up to the knee (perhaps with no bottom to allow for barefoot running).
  • Compression arm sleeves.
  • Heart rate monitor with GPS.
  • Googles to protect the eyes.
  • Magnetic band for strength and balance.

You get my point.  All of these things offer either some type of protection and some improvement in results, but it can go too far (IMHO).  Although on the flipside, the competitor inside me is anxious to try them out.

Why We Need Recess At Work

More exercise = higher GPAs

More activities = better grades especially in math, English, and reading

Exercise = greater productivity and less sick days

Physical activity = increased blood flow to the brain fueling memory, attention, and creativity

Physical activity = hormones that improve mood and suppress stress

Any more information needed?

I was reading an article about research into why recess is important for kids in school.  I couldn’t agree more, but it got me wondering about the need for running clubs and other fitness breaks within the corporate work day.  I’m pretty sure  working through lunch and eating at your desk doesn’t help.  On the flipside, I’m not sure if fuzzball tables and other “dotcom” activities meet the activity level.

Food for thought…and of course this doesn’t account for potential hard dollar savings associated with better health and lower healthcare costs.

Presenting at PBMI in February

I am excited about the opportunity to present at PBMI in February.  I hope many of you will be there.  If you want to meet up, send me a quick note at gvanantwerp at mac dot com.  Thanks.

Here’s the description of my presentation:

The PBM industry continues to consolidate through mergers and acquisitions.  At the same time, new PBMs and niche PBMs continue to grow.  While the majority of the green space is gone, there is increasing focus on the individual market through exchanges and the Managed Medicaid market.  But, this maturing of the market has forced PBMs to look at more organic growth opportunities also.  How do you retain business?  How do you innovate?  How can you increase profitability per member?  With a few large market dynamics playing out in 2012, we’ll begin to look at what the future might hold and what we can learn from the past.  It is an interesting time for all PBMs, pharmacies, and manufacturers as they embrace the role of pharmacy in improving overall health outcomes.   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 117 other followers