Archive | Marketing / Communications RSS feed for this section

Changing Marketing Paradigms

Traditionally, consumer marketing has focused on the “young invincibles” as they are sometimes referred to in healthcare. Those are the 18-34 year olds that traditionally were the DINKs (dual income no kids) and younger population with more disposable income or focused on acquiring goods (as they bought homes and started careers).

Well, I think this quote by Sunil Gupta summarizes the issue:

If [young adults] have no money in their pockets, there is nothing to sell them.

With 46% of those age 18-24 unemployed and 20% of those 25-34 living at home, this group’s financial dynamics are very different. The focus on both those with money and those driving the healthcare costs have shifted to Baby Boomers. (Facts from Time article on page 16 in the 4/9/12 edition.)

At the same time, I read an article about marketing to women which continue to make majority of healthcare decisions both for themselves and their families. (and caregivers (often women) are less likely to be adherent to their own medications.)  Here were the recommended approaches:

  • Offer highly personalized formats
  • Provide complete anonymity
  • Eliminate the middle man
  • Understand self-perceptions
  • Consider the unique point of sale

And, some of these changes are driven by the economy. For example, according to NCH Marketing and Parks Associates, 81% of people are using coupons regularly and they redeemed them for 3.5B in 2011. (Of course, the jury is still out on the Groupon model…)

AHRQ Questions are the Answer campaign

I often talk about the issue of communications in healthcare. That could be patient to patient, healthplan to patient, pharmacist to patient, or physician to patient (or many more).

Understanding health literacy and personal motivation are critical as are so many other factors. With that in mind, I was glad to see this new campaign from AHRQ.

(Here’s the text they sent me about it.)

“When patients become more actively involved in their own health, there’s a much stronger likelihood their health outcomes will be better.

That’s why “Questions are the Answer,” a new public education initiative from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), encourages patients to have more effective two-way communication with their doctors and other clinicians.

“Questions are the Answer” features a website — www.ahrq.gov/questions — where you will find these free educational tools to use with your patients:

· A 7-minute video featuring real-life patients and clinicians who give firsthand accounts on the importance of asking questions and sharing information – this tool is ideal for a patient waiting room area and can be set to run on a continuous loop.
· A brochure, titled “Be More Involved in Your Health Care: Tips for Patients,” that offers helpful suggestions to follow before, during and after a medical visit.
· Notepads to help patients prioritize the top three questions they wish to ask during their medical appointment.

Clinicians can request a free supply of these materials by calling AHRQ at 1-800-358-9295 or sending an email to AHRQpubs@ahrq.hhs.gov.”

All of this is good information, BUT:

  • Do physicians have time for this and are they prepared for these dialogues in plain language and with handouts and URLs they recommend?
  • Are patient’s prepared to slow their physicians down and make sure they explain everything?
  • Will this get measured at some point as a qualitative metric and correlated to outcomes?
  • Some Facts On Palliative Care

    In the book called Healthcare in 2020 by Steve Jacob, there is a chapter on End-of-Life Care. It provides some great data all sourced there (so not repeated here). I find this whole are of discussion especially around palliative care very interesting.

    First, let’s define palliative care:

    Palliative care (from Latin palliare, to cloak) is an area of healthcare that focuses on relieving and preventing the suffering of patients. Unlike hospice care, palliative medicine is appropriate for patients in all disease stages, including those undergoing treatment for curable illnesses and those living with chronic diseases, as well as patients who are nearing the end of life. Palliative medicine utilizes a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, relying on input from physicians, pharmacists, nurses, chaplains, social workers, psychologists, and other allied health professionals in formulating a plan of care to relieve suffering in all areas of a patient’s life. This multidisciplinary approach allows the palliative care team to address physical, emotional, spiritual, and social concerns that arise with advanced illness. (from Wikipedia)

    The challenge of course is that most people don’t want to talk about dying, and physicians are taught to try everything to cure someone. After talking with a few people working in this area, the general scenario is where clinicians and other social workers are helping to enable to a patient to talk to their family and care team about their wishes. It’s not to make the decisions, but to give patients the tools to have an informed discussion.

    Here were some of the interesting things from this chapter in the book:

    • Less that ¼ of physicians were familiar with the term in a survey
    • The American Society of Clinical Oncology has established a goal of integrating palliative care into its model of comprehensive cancer care by 2020.
    • A 2009 study of cancer patients found that palliative care improved patient satisfaction and eased pain, fatigue, nausea, insomnia, anxiety, and depression. And, increased appetite.
    • According to the Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance, more than 100M people worldwide would benefit annually from either palliative care or hospice…yet only 8% have access to it.
    • The average physician’s estimate of how long a patient will live was 530% too high.
    • Fewer than 40% of oncologists speak candidly with patients about end-of-life treatments.
    • Physicians equate suggesting hospice as “giving up”.
    • A 2008 published study showed that patient satisfaction was higher, more advance directives were completed, fewer ICU admissions were necessary, and medical costs were lower for patients in palliative care.
    • Patients with lung cancer that received palliative care lived 3 months longer than those with standard care (which compares to only getting 2-3 months of life from chemotherapy). [BTW – 1 in 5 cancer patients are still receiving chemotherapy in the last two weeks of life.]
    • A hospitalized palliative-care patient costs $279-$374 less per day.
    • In a Medicare study, patients who received palliative care cost $6,900 less during a hospital stay.

    This seems like great data. Imagine that you can improve a patient’s experience in the last months of life and lower costs. To me, that’s a lot of what our healthcare system needs these days.

    What Is Motivational Interviewing?

    Motivational interviewing (MI) is a technique that we’ve been talking about in pharmacy for years (e.g., study re: MI and adherence), and care management has also been using this approach (e.g., CV study and chronic kidney study).  As we all know, getting consumers to engage is difficult.  It’s even more difficult to get them to engage and actually change behavior.

    As I understand it, this technique is focused on using open ended questions to understand a patient’s barriers to change as expressed in their own words.  It seems to be based on the traditional concept of active listening.  In healthcare, this changes the paradigm from a prescriptive approach to more of an enablement apporach.  Just like health literacy, I think of motivational interviewing as another leg of stool in creating an effective program for care management.  (article on nurse training)

    Definition from Wikipedia:

    Motivational interviewing (MI) refers to a counseling approach in part developed by clinical psychologists Professor William R Miller, Ph.D. and Professor Stephen Rollnick, Ph.D. The concept of motivational interviewing evolved from experience in the treatment of problem drinkers, and was first described by Miller (1983) in an article published in Behavioural Psychotherapy. These fundamental concepts and approaches were later elaborated by Miller and Rollnick (1991) in a more detailed description of clinical procedures. Motivational interviewing is a semi-directive, client-centered counseling style for eliciting behavior change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence. Compared with non-directive counseling, it is more focused and goal-directed. Motivational Interviewing is a method that works on facilitating and engaging intrinsic motivation within the client in order to change behavior. The examination and resolution of ambivalence is a central purpose, and the counselor is intentionally directive in pursuing this goal.

    Motivational interviewing recognizes and accepts the fact that clients who need to make changes in their lives approach counseling at different levels of readiness to change their behavior. If the counseling is mandated, they may never have thought of changing the behavior in question. Some may have thought about it but not taken steps to change it. Others, especially those voluntarily seeking counseling, may be actively trying to change their behavior and may have been doing so unsuccessfully for years. In order for a therapist to be successful at motivational interviewing, four basic skills should first be established. These skills include: the ability to ask open ended questions, the ability to provide affirmations, the capacity for reflective listening, and the ability to periodically provide summary statements to the client.

    Here’s a video on motivational interviewing:

     

    Understanding Health Literacy Is Important For Care Management

    If you’re going to care for a patient, it’s critical to understand their level of health literacy.  A new study shows the correlation (not necessarily cause and effect) between health literacy and death.  Older people were twice as likely to die if they had poor health literacy in a five-year period.

    “Previous studies have found that low health literacy is associated with less knowledge of chronic diseases, poorer mental and physical health, less use of preventive health services and higher rates of hospital admission, according to background information in the report.”

    Employee Wellness Matters

    If you look at the infographic below, it paints a sad picture of how work impacts our healthcare.  At the same time, we have lots of discussion about the benefits (or lack of) for disease management and wellness programs.

    I think its critical for employers to play a role in helping engage and educate their employees about health and wellness.  I think this interview with MemorialCare Health System paints a good picture of why and how to approach this.

    A University of Michigan study revealed health costs for a high-risk worker is three times that of a low-risk employee. American Institute of Preventive Medicine reports 87.5 percent of health claim costs are due to lifestyle. Companies implementing wellness activities save from $3.48 to $5.42 for every dollar spent and reduce absences 30 percent.

    Work Is Murder
    Created by: Online University

    My PCMA Presentation On Copay Cards

    I’m giving my PCMA presentation in FL right now about copay cards. For those of you that can’t attend, here is my executive summary and a copy of some slides. (My actual slide deck was shorter for presentation but this gives more data to those of you looking online.)

    I focused on three key points:

    1. Copay cards are a direct threat to the PBM model. They can run against the idea of copay differentials and formulary tiers. Since they’re not allowed at mail order, they create a disconnect there. And, eventually, I believe they will be in conflict with rebates (i.e., why pay for both).
    2. The cost numbers to the payer are huge ($32B according to Visante) although this is less than $1 per Rx over that 10 year time period. But, it’s concentrated on 3% of all scripts which makes it a big deal.
    3. There should be a win-win IF they are concentrated on specialty medications with a link to improved adherence and health outcomes.

    There doesn’t seem to be clear data (although another article says it is available) but the general data shows that availability and use of copay cards is growing rapidly.

    Investing in copay cards seems to be based on four myths:

    1. Cost is a large issue in non-adherence. It’s an issue but not the dominant issue.
    2. Costs will influence physician choice. The reality is that they don’t know the costs and see this as a pharmacist issue.
    3. Copay cards are a cost effective way to improve adherence. They get about a 10% improvement in MPR which sometimes produces a positive ROI. There are much lower cost ways to get a similar improvement.
    4. Copay cards can delay conversion to generics. This is still in the air with the Pfizer Lipitor program, but if it works, it will be a lightning rod for PBMs and payers to focus on.

    This topic’s not going away. For now, the easy PBM response is to close down the formulary, move more scripts to mail, and implement prior authorization programs. I would expect this will happen more often unless there is more transparency here around what’s happening and the benefits.

    Reading Labels; Understanding Side Effects

    We all know people don’t read labels on their medications or their over-the-counter (OTC) pills. If they did, their eyes would gloss over, and they would start to worry about all the side effects. Of course, this is a problem since some things can create drug-drug interactions or create an overdose.

    I was reading an article in USA Today called “Read the labels because ‘all drugs have side effects’“. It lists out Tylenol, Advil, Motrin, Benadryl, Claritin, and Zantac as examples of OTC medications with overdose risks. It gives more details on these and provides several other examples. Here’s a quote from the article:

    “It’s important for the public to realize that all drugs have side effects. It doesn’t matter if they’re prescription, over-the-counter, herbals or nutritional supplements. If they have active ingredients, they have side effects and can interfere with normal body functions.” Brian Strom, director of the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the University of Pennsylvania

    The reality is that we’re making an unconscious choice about tradeoffs. Do the risks and probabilities of the side effects outweigh the probabilities of improvement?  Of course, in many situations, they do. 

    I think this points to several things:

    • Document everything you take whether it’s an Rx, OTC, herbal, or supplement.
    • Read labels.
    • Tell your MD and Pharmacist what your taking especially if it’s regular and long-term.

    Ideally, once we have broad use of PHRs (personal health records) which are tied into our grocery bills to track purchases and use then computer algorithms can look for risk factors. And, with personalized medicine, we might one day know which things to avoid based on our genes.

    The Well Being Index

    I find this to be an interesting study (the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index). Gallup and Healthways are surveying 1,000 people per day for 350 days per year and has been doing it for several years.

    I was reading one of their brochures looking at data from 1/2/10 – 12/30/10. Here’s a few observations:

    • The index score across all states varies by a narrow range of 9.3 points.
    • The top 5 states (in 2010) were:
      • Hawaii
      • Wyoming
      • North Dakota
      • Alaska
      • Colorado
    • The top 5 large cities were:
      • Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
      • Austin-Round Rock, TX
      • San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
      • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
      • San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA

    The overall composite score is based on six sub-indices:

    • Life Evaluation
      • Partially based on the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale
    • Emotional Health
      • A composite of how the consumer felt yesterday along nine dimensions
    • Physical Health
      • Body Mass Index
      • Disease burden
      • Sick days
      • Physical pain
      • Daily energy
      • History of disease
      • Daily health experiences
    • Healthy Behavior
      • Life style habits
    • Work Environment
      • Feelings and perceptions about work
    • Basic Access
      • 13 items measuring:
        • Access to food
        • Access to shelter
        • Access to healthcare
        • Having a safe and satisfying place to live

    This gives an interesting macro view of healthcare at a localized level. The thing I’d like to learn is how this is shaping communities and health care entities to act different. Is this changing engagement strategies? Is this changing regional investments? Can the data be tied back to individuals and used to help improve outcomes?

    Uping The RxAnte: An Adherence Predictive Model

    Those of you that have heard me speak know that I look at this topic of predicting adherence both from an area of fascination along with the eye of a skeptic.  While I love the concept of predicting someone’s adherence and therefore determining how to best support them from an intervention approach, I also believe that the general predictors are pretty straightforward:

    1. Number of medications
    2. Plan design (i.e., cost)
    3. Gender
    4. Health literacy and engagement (see PAM score research)

    And, this is a hot topic (see post on FICO adherence score).  You can see my prior posts on some different studies, on the Merck Estimator, and some notes from the NEHI event on this topic.  It generated a good dialogue on Kevin MD’s blog when I talked about paying MD for adherence.

    I had a chance to talk with Josh Benner the CEO of RxAnte the other day.  It sounds very interesting, and they have an impressive team assembled.  In general, they’re focused on:

    • Predictive modeling
    • Decision rules
    • Monitoring and managing claims to track adherence
    • Evaluating effectiveness of interventions
    • And creating a learning system

    There are definitely some correlations to the work we do at Silverlink Communications around adherence.  We’re helping clients determine a communication strategy that might include call center agents, direct mail, automated calls, e-mail, SMS, mobile, or web solutions.  We’re looking at segmentation and prioritization.  We’re looking at past behavior and messaging.  The goal is how to best spend resources to drive health outcomes from primary adherence to sustaining adherence.  This is a challenge, and we all need to build upon the work that each other is doing to improve in this area.  We have a huge problem globally with adherence.

    Why People Under 35 Are Stressed

    This is a great list from what Beth Braverman calls “The Beaten Generation” looking at what’s happened since 2005:

    • Their home equity has dropped 51%
    • Their net worth is down 55%.
    • Their student debt is up 19%.
    • Unemployment for college grads is up 64%.
    • Their income is down 4.5%
    • 31% more are living with their parents.
    • The birth rate is down 7.1%.
    • 22% less think they’ll be able to retire by age 65.

    And, we wonder why they’re pessimistic…

    Stressed Out Workers Spend 2X On Healthcare

    Are you stressed out? In today’s economy, many people are. Whether it’s being a caregiver, your job, or other concerns (like just paying the bills), have you ever thought about how much that costs you?

    According to some data shared by Money Magazine, here are some examples of stress related ailments and their average annual costs:

    • Obesity – $2,600-$4,900
    • Back Pain – $1,300
    • Insomnia – $200-$1,200
    • Hypertension – $1,100
    • Teeth Grinding – $200-$1,100

    That’s real money!

    Some of their suggestions (other than going on a long vacation):

    1. Take advantage of the EAP (Employee Assistance Program) that your company might offer.
    2. Use the wellness programs that your employer might offer (since 74% of them do offer something).
    3. Go see a therapist and look into CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy).
    4. Workout.
    5. Take a break from e-mail (or your smartphone and constant Facebook updates).
    6. Stop multi-tasking.
    7. Meditate.

    (Beat Stress For Less by Kate Ashford)

    The New Post-Recession Consumer

    I’m always fascinated by segmentation, and I think understanding how market events like the Great Recession have changed the fundamentals of the game is important. In November 2011, Money Magazine shared some data from a survey they did. Here are some of the results.

    • 53% of Americans aren’t sure their kids will better off then they are.
    • 67% are worked their quality of life will suffer in retirement.
    • 80% say they’re eating at home more.
    • 75% say time with family is more important than ever.

    “Big periods of economic upheaval can define a generation. Not so much because of the depth of this recession, but because of its prolonged nature, it will have lasting impact.” Paul Flatters, Managing Director of Trajectory Partnership. (How The Economy Changed You by Dan Kadlec)

    • 85% spend more time looking for deals before they buy. (hence the couponing craze)
    • 57% are building an emergency fund.
    • 51% are pessimistic about the US economy in the next 12 months.
    • 61% are pessimistic about government officials spurring growth.

    I don’t know about you, but I see a ton of nuggets in here about positioning generic drugs, preventative health, adherence, mail order, and many other cost savings actions in healthcare.

    Pharmacy Needs A Neuromarketing Study

    I was reading this article in Fast Company about neuromarketing with a focus on the CEO of NeuroFocus. Companies like PepsiCo, Intel, CBS, ESPN, and eBay have used them and many others are trying work in this area. But, I’ve never heard of a healthcare company doing anything in this space. I’ve talked about this before in my article about the book Buyology. It’s fascinating, and the mobile tool that NeuroFocus has created could create new ways of capturing data.

    One interesting example he talked about was the expression of a person on a poster (for example). If the expression is too easy to decipher, we simply move on…BUT if it’s hard to decipher, it causes us to pause and think.

    He also talks about always putting images on the left hand side of the screen and words on the right. (Seems applicable to direct mail and maybe my next slide presentation.)

    Another example is that the brain loves curves not sharp edges.

    Given the shifting pharmacy marketplace, I would think this is a study that the industry needs. The PBMs should better understand what the consumer thinks about when they hear the word mail order. Manufacturers should understand the reaction to brand names or copay cards. The retailers should think about how brand equity plays into choice. There are endless opportunities here. (A business opportunity perhaps!)

    (They Have Hacked Your Brain by Adam Penenberg)

    Wellpoint Quote On Drug Copay Cards

    This topic seems to be heating back up based on several posts on Adam Fein’s blog (Lipitor, adherence) and an article in Drug Benefit News where this quote appeared along with an AIS blog post questioning the PBM’s dislike of copay cards (from the same article that Adam mentioned).

    “Copay offset programs [offered by brand-name drugmakers to compete with generics] mitigate the effectiveness of our tiered benefit design programs and [are] going against what we’re trying to accomplish for our members’ health and for employers.”

    — Peter Clagett, vice president of pharmaceutical strategies and PBM oversight for WellPoint, Inc.

     

    How Does Pharma Measure ROI?

    I found this chart from Cutting Edge Information a good summary of what metrics pharma uses in measuring ROI.  (This was in the most recent PharmaVOICE magazine.)  I would assume copay cards address most of these with a 4:1-6:1 ROI being quoted in the Visante study by PCMA

    Walgreens Interview As Follow-up To Their White Paper

    As anyone who follows the pharmacy industry knows (and now millions of consumers), Walgreens and Express Scripts have had an ongoing contract dispute since mid-2011.  Most of us expected this to get resolved by the end of the year to minimize patient disruption, but it didn’t.

    With that in mind, Walgreens has published several white papers to help articulate the results of their employer survey data and to help plans quantify the value of keeping Walgreens in the network.  As this is a fascinating case study that will someday make a great Harvard case study, I reached out to Walgreens to get their thoughts on a few points.

    Thanks to their PR team, I was able to get responses from Michael Polzin, their VP of Corporate Communications, to my questions.

    Consumers are always resistant to change.  After the initial disruption and assuming you eventually reach terms with Express Scripts, how will you get your consumers to return to Walgreens’ pharmacy?  Is the retail pharmacy experience able to be significantly differentiated?  How are you doing this today?

    As we’ve previously stated, we are now moving on without being part of the Express Scripts network. While we are open to any fair and competitive offer from them, we also are fine with continuing to operate our business without Express Scripts.

    We intend to retain patients affected by this situation over time by reaching out on both a consumer level and a business-to-business level. To date, more than 120 health plans, employers and other Express Scripts clients have informed us that they have either changed pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) or taken steps consistent with their contracts to maintain access to Walgreens pharmacies in 2012.  That represents 10 million of the 88 million Express Scripts prescriptions we filled last year. We’re also in active negotiations with many health plans and employers to provide access to Walgreens in their networks as soon as their contracts allow. In addition to those 10 million prescriptions already retained, we also expect to retain many Medicare Part D patients who previously were in an Express Scripts-managed Part D plan and moved to a different plan during last fall’s open enrollment period. We will get more detail on those numbers when CMS announces the results of the open enrollment period later this month.

    On the consumer level, they are very receptive to looking at options to continue using Walgreens pharmacies whenever possible. They want to retain their choice of pharmacy and are exercising that ability as best they can. For example, we’ve had great response this month with our Prescription Savings Club (PSC) promotion. The PSC offers savings on more than 8,000 brand name and all generic medications. During the month of January, you can get an annual membership in this program for just $5 ($10 for a family).  We have seen more than 250,000 patients sign up for the club just since Jan. 1, and we continue to have record sign-up days. The interest we’ve seen in the club has been extraordinary.

    As for differentiating the retail pharmacy experience, that is exactly what we are doing through our new Well Experience store format, which has piloted so far in about 20 Chicago area stores and the entire Indianapolis market. The pharmacy, health and wellness area of these stores are truly a game changer. The pharmacist is more accessible by bringing them out from behind the pharmacy counter to a desk in front of the pharmacy. As a result, patient interactions are higher than our pharmacists have ever experienced. The format also allows for tighter integration between our Take Care Clinic nurse practitioners and pharmacists to create a real community health corner.

    We’ve had many CEOs of major health plans and large employers tour these Well Experience stores, and their No. 1 comment is, “This is exactly what we need. How fast can you make this happen?”

    The white papers are good summaries for the consultants. How are you taking your message to other constituents – consumers, MDs, Wall Street?

    Our best ambassadors to consumers are our pharmacy staffs. They are the ones with the trusted relationship with our customers and are able to have individual, face-to-face conversations with them. They’ve done a tremendous job educating our patients, and that’s why we’re seeing so much interest in the PSC and have patients finding other ways to continue using Walgreens, such as using their spouse’s coverage, if available.

    The same is true with physicians. Our pharmacy staff work with them every day and help them find the best options for their patients including generic alternatives that can be very competitive through the PSC card with a 90-day supply compared with the patient’s program under Express Scripts.

    As for Wall Street, we’ve been quite active speaking at analyst conferences, addressing the issue on our earnings conference calls and at our recent annual shareholders meeting. The analysts also have found our white papers and other SEC filings to be helpful in understanding the situation.

    Ultimately, payers/employers care about cost.  If a PBM creates savings for them thru a limited network, can you summarize what they lose by not including Walgreens and how that transfers to hard dollar savings?  Are Walgreens consumers more engaged with their health?  Are they more satisfied with their healthcare?

    Our research demonstrates the importance of Walgreens presence in a payers’ network in addition to the cost factor. A Walgreens proprietary survey conducted in December of 823 executives and managers who are key decision makers for pharmacy benefit decisions or provide input found that 82 percent of employers said that they would not exclude Walgreens for less than 5 percent savings on their total pharmacy spend. Sixty percent of employers would not exclude Walgreens for less than 10 percent savings, and 21 percent would not exclude Walgreens from their network regardless of the amount of savings. These findings on employer attitudes are consistent with recent research published by several leading equity research analysts. Clearly, employers value having Walgreens as a pharmacy option for their employees, but Express Scripts wants to take that choice away.

    Now, add to that the small variation in costs among pharmacies. We believe that the vast majority of pharmacies, including Walgreens, receive reimbursements per prescription that fall within a narrow band, typically within less than 5 percent of one another. Therefore, excluding any pharmacy with our 20 percent market share from a 5 percent pricing band can only result in savings on the order of 1 percent or less. And that doesn’t take into consideration the additional savings Walgreens can provide through our leading generic dispensing rate or the 7 percent savings that payers can see by adding a 90-day refill option at our retail pharmacies.

    It’s also important to point out that during negotiations, Walgreens offered to hold rates for a new contract flat and did not seek an increase in rates. The response from Express Scripts was to insist on being able to unilaterally define contract terms, such as what does and does not constitute a brand and generic drug. Express Scripts also proposed to slash Walgreens reimbursement rates to levels below the industry average cost to provide each prescription.

    Walgreens is focused on helping payers with their total health care spend, not just the 10-12 percent of their health care costs that are spent on prescription drugs. While a patient with asthma can lower drug spend by not getting refills on their medication, the resulting emergency room visit that could result will be much more expensive overall for the payer. So we are focused on expanding the pharmacist’s role among health care providers to lower overall medical costs rather than focusing on drug spend alone.

    Adherence is a big issue these days especially in Medicare where it is one of the key Star measures for PDP. One of the key value points in the paper is about adherence. How has Walgreens improved patient adherence and are you collaborating with payers to do this?

    Walgreens pharmacies provide many medication adherence services, counseling and other assistance that lowers medical costs by improving outcomes. These include monthly adherence calls to inform patients about critical upcoming blood tests that are required to continue therapy; next-day home delivery for medications; assistance programs to help patients minimize risk resulting from economic circumstances that may negatively impact therapy compliance; and alerts for missed doses, at-risk patient behavior or serious adverse side effects that are communicated to a prescribing physician. We also offer 90-day supplies of medication, further promoting adherence. Walgreens pharmacists have consistently demonstrated increased adherence to chronic medicines for high-risk conditions for the populations that we serve. For example, for patients in one study who filled their statin and thyroid medications at community pharmacies and who consulted with a pharmacist, a significant improvement in first refill rates resulted (from 55.7 percent to 70.4 percent) after the adherence program was implemented.

    While CVS has opted to own a PBM, Walgreens has sold their PBM.  Has this experience with Express Scripts changed the way you interact and contract with PBMs?  Do you think this will have broader implications on the industry?

    I think it has helped us tremendously in terms of building closer relationships with other PBMs and payers. We’re moving forward with partners such as Catalyst Rx, Prime Therapeutics and SXC Health Solutions, and health plans such as Coventry and Humana. All of us see this as an opportunity to create a differentiated offering during the upcoming selling season.

    Have any PBMs stepped up to work more strategically with you to create a differentiated offering to take advantage of this disruption during the 2012 selling season?

    See answer above.

    What’s next?  As Walgreens looks to the future and focuses on creating new value, how are you embracing key changes in the industry around health reform and technology innovation?

    See question 1 and our development of the Well Experience store and pharmacy format.

    “Twight” (Twitter Fight) Between $ESRX and $WAG

    This is either a massive validation of the perceived value of Twitter or a crazy distraction, but either way, it’s interesting to those of us who study the industry and/or study marketing and communications. 

    As part of the ongoing dispute between Walgreens and Express Scripts, Twitter has become one of the latest tools.  (see June post and September post)  In an effort to sway public opinion and thereby pressure Express Scripts and its clients, Walgreens turned to bloggers and Twitter to push their messaging…but these were in some case paid comments which was surprising.  They already have strong messaging in their IChooseWalgreens website and whitepapers on the Value of Walgreens.  I also thought they were demonstrating some success in converting people to their discount program which was part of their overall growth strategy shared at their shareholders meeting

    After Walgreens (with almost 84,000 followers) created a promoted hashtag of #ILoveWalgreens, Express Scripts (with 1,645 followers) countered back with several Tweets about the dispute (see below).  I guess the question is whether with millions affected and decisions made by the businesses and not consumers…does this forum matter?  But, journalists and analysts follow them so it’s important to keep the messaging up.  (Other articles on this are here, here, and here.)

    Conveniently, I found this infographic on how Twitter is changing healthcare.  At the same time, this is an interesting fight because it’s a blend of B2C and B2B crossing paths.  More to come since I’m sure this fight is long from over.

    Medicare and Medicaid Social Media Use For Healthcare

    As people look at ways to engage the Medicare and Medicaid populations, I continue to talk about the facts from the Pew research that shows how these demographics use technology.  I was glad to see some research from PWC that also reinforced this.  As you can see in the three charts below, the Medicare population uses technology similar to the average respondent while the Medicaid population uses social media for healthcare more. 

    Mouthguards For Non-Contact Sports

    I wore a mouthguard when I played lacrosse, but I’m not sure I could see myself putting in a mouthguard for running or playing tennis or golf.  Under Armour is pushing a series of mouthguards for any sport now (see brochure).  But, from a purely academic perspective, it’s interesting.

    The material says that:

    • It improves airflow.
    • It reduces stress.
    • It improves strength.
    • It reduces lactic build-up.
    • It improves response time.
    • It reduces cortisol production.

    It just makes me think that you’ll create this casual athlete with:

    • A mouthguard.
    • Nose strips to improve breathing.
    • Dark compression socks pulled up to the knee (perhaps with no bottom to allow for barefoot running).
    • Compression arm sleeves.
    • Heart rate monitor with GPS.
    • Googles to protect the eyes.
    • Magnetic band for strength and balance.

    You get my point.  All of these things offer either some type of protection and some improvement in results, but it can go too far (IMHO).  Although on the flipside, the competitor inside me is anxious to try them out.

    Will Patient Reported Data Augment Claims Based Models?

    On the one hand, it seems fairly obvious that patient reported data (use of OTCs, exercise, food intake) is important in understanding their healthcare.  On the other hand, the historical bias has been to use historical claims to predict future costs.  At a minimum, I think that studies around tools like PAM (Patient Activation Measure) have shown that patient reported information is important in understanding their literacy and attitudes on healthcare.  This data is critical in designing effective healthcare engagement programs.  [One of the reasons that Silverlink has stressed our focus on using data for segmentation and personalization for years.] 

    That’s why I found one of the latest studies by Kaiser to be really important.  They used both claims data and patient reported data to evaluate inpatient admission rates and costs.  And, as explained below, this data increased the predictive power of their model. 

    The research determined that self-reported information about being in poorer health was a key determinant in predicting higher inpatient admissions and for being in the top tier for costs. Higher admission rates and costs were associated with patients who self-reported:

    • Lower score for general self-rated health
    • Yes to “do you need help with one or more activities of daily living?”
    • Yes to “do you have a bothersome health condition?”

    The addition of this self-reported information to a claims history model explained an additional 2.8 percent of variance in admissions and 4 percent in cost.

    Good Health Is More Than Skin Deep

    In the July 11th Time Magazine, there was a small article which I think made a great point – you can be lean and still be at risk for heart disease and diabetes due to fat.  What you can’t tell by weight and appearance is the person’s genetics.  Apparently, international researchers have found a specific variant of a gene that regulates where and how fat is stored.  People with the “lean gene” were storing fat deeper in the body around organs and in tissues.  This visceral fat is more dangerous and can impair bodily functions. 

    So…the key point is that even healthy looking people need to monitor their cholesterol and glucose levels.  (I guess those advertisements for high cholesterol drugs were right!)

    Infographic: New Year’s Resolutions

    I’m not a big New Year’s Eve fan.  I much rather start the new year refreshed and beginning to think about my goals for the next year.  While I used to do a very rigorous 1, 3, 5, and 10-year plan every New Year’s Day, I’ve been a little slack lately.  I’m going to try to be better this week and at least get some 1 and 5-year personal and professional goals captured. 

    With that being said, I liked this infographic from visual.ly.  It’s relevant if you think in terms of prescription adherence. 

    Opportunists vs. Solidarity

    With the Walgreens and Express Scripts dispute unresolved, you are certainly seeing more of an opportunistic attitude in pharmacies than one of solidarity.  Maybe this shouldn’t be a surprise, but early on, I thought that the pharmacy groups would see Walgreens as their “leader” standing up to the large PBM.  If the largest retailer can’t get negotiating leverage over the PBM, can anyone?

    Now, if you go into my local grocery store (Dierbergs), you see signs about moving your prescriptions to them from Walgreens before it’s too late.  You see and hear videos playing throughout the store talking about how to move your prescriptions and how easy it is.

    CVS Caremark is predicting that it could see as many as 23M prescriptions move from Walgreens to CVS stores.

    I’m certainly a fan of preferred or limited networks although I’m not sure I ever imagined a scenario where one PBM would totally exclude one of the big two retailers.  I always imagined a scenario where you were playing them off each other and letting the client choose which one(s) to exclude.

    You can see in the new whitepaper by Walgreens that they point out several things:

    • The savings  being offered / created is likely not enough for clients to want to exclude Walgreens and create the disruption.
    • Clients who can include Walgreens are doing so and others would like to or believe they can.
    • If Walgreens is excluded long-term, self-funded clients will be more likely to consider other PBMs.
    • Many people still think this will get resolved in 2011 or by early 2012.

    This brings up two other discussion topics:

    1. Will they come back?  If the disruption happens (or has already happened), will consumers come back to Walgreens once they are back in the network?  This will be a true test of satisfaction, branding, and many other efforts.  On the flipside, the other retailers should be spending real effort welcoming and trying to retain the new consumers so they don’t boomerang back.
    2. Has the pressure shifted from Walgreens to Express Scripts?  Depending on the timing, Walgreens will have felt most of their pain by mid-January.  At that point, the pressure (IMHO) shifts to Express Scripts.  Will they want to go through their 2012 selling season without Walgreens in their network, a major acquisition in the works, and any other potential distractions?  I wouldn’t.

    Using the Local Pharmacist to Moderate the P2P Discussion

    P2P or Peer-to-Peer healthcare is a common discussion topic these days. Patients want to go online and learn from others with their condition on sites like Inspire.com or PatientsLikeMe.com. The government has been one of the early adopters.

    “The social media sites we have created show that the government can interact in a meaningful way with the public. We don’t just push information out; we strive to make the content relevant so people can act on it, share it with family or friends and ultimately change their behavior.” Amy Burnett, CDC (Tapping Into The Power By Getting Personal, Robin Robinson, PharmaVOICE, May 2011)

    The question is how can traditional companies – pharmaceutical manufacturers, disease management companies, providers, managed care companies, pharmacies, and PBMs – interact in these discussions. On the one hand, they have a broad depth of experience and data to share. On the other hand, they can’t just jump in and drive their agenda. They have to add value to the conversation, demonstrate that they care, and add value.

    Much like the idea that you can purchase things online and return them to the physical store, I think these virtual discussions need to eventually be tied to a physical experience for many patients. One group that I think could play significantly in this is local pharmacists. Imagine that a chain or an association created a social media team. That team could monitor and interact with patients especially in key conditions such as some of the specialty drug areas. As relevant, this could be linked back to a local store where a pharmacist could spend time consulting with the patient. I think this would be a great way to drive the retail specialty business and increase consumer brand awareness.

    “The potential use of social media as a bellwether for identifying trends, informational gaps, support tools, even improved communications between providers, allied health professionals, and others could pave the way for a more collaborative approach to population mapping and patient care.” Michael Parks, Vox Media (Social Media: Paving The Way, Robin Robinson, PharmaVOICE, May 2011)

    The CDC has even created a toolkit for people to use.

    Cost and Outcomes Drive Better Use of Data

    Overall, I would describe healthcare companies as trying to figure out how to drive the best outcomes at the lowest cost while maintaining a positive consumer experience.  This isn’t easy.  One area of opportunity that companies increasingly look at is how to use data to become smarter. 

    • Can I build a predictive model of response curves?  Who’s likely to respond?  Who’s likely to take action?
    • Can I develop a segmentation model that works?  How will I customize my communications after the segmentation?
    • Can I rank and prioritize my outreaches?  Should I do that based on risk or based on potential value? 

    Ultimately, I think this is driving companies to be a lot smarter and to look at how they use both medical and pharmacy data.  For example, I’ll point to both CVS Caremark and Prime Therapeutics in press releases from earlier this year. 

    “The ActiveHealth CareEngine offers evidence-based information that can be used to improve the health care of our members and enables us to take our programs to the next level by seamlessly incorporating medical data,” stated Troyen Brennan, EVP and chief medical officer of CVS Caremark. “This agreement will enhance our existing programs to identify issues related to gaps in care, potential drug-to-drug interactions and duplicative care — information that is important to bring to the attention of the member’s physician.”  (article that this is sourced from)

    Smart use of medical and pharmacy data is one of the most powerful tools we have to improve outcomes and increase value for our members and clients,” said David Lassen, PharmD, Chief Clinical Officer at Prime. “Through ongoing partnership with health plan clients, Prime is uniquely positioned to view the entire spectrum of patient care, and we can leverage that information to help manage cost and to improve outcomes. We are very excited to collaborate with Corticon on the development of this clinical platform.” (press release)

    The next step will be to integrate PRO (patient reported outcomes) from sources like connected devices and PHR (personal health records) that might show blood pressure, workouts, calories, or other data points that could help companies determine when to intervene and how to add value to drive an outcome.

    Additionally, another key is continued work in the outcomes-based contracting world and bonus areas such as Star Ratings where the financial value is tied in the short-term to outcomes.  This creates a burning platform for smarter use of data and use of a broader set of data to understand and impact care.

    State By State Rankings – Key Healthcare Metrics

    United Health Foundation published their Health Rankings today which offers some great statistics and interactive graphics to see how states compare on things like high cholesterol and diabetes. I pulled a few examples here, but it’s definitely worth checking out.

    What’s Your Digital Strategy?

    Do you have a digital strategy?  Even if you don’t call it out that way, you certainly have digital as part of your overall member and physician strategy these days. 

    Hopefully, you start with a few basics like:

    • What do I want to accomplish?
    • How do I measure success?
    • Who am I targeting?
    • What does my target group do online and what tools do they use (and for what)?
    • What is my competition doing?  (and what do companies outside my vertical that I want to emulate do)

    Once you know those things, you can start looking at different areas of focus.  The key ones that jump to mind for me are:

    • Search engine optimization
    • Brand monitoring (e.g., Radian6)
    • Content creation (blogging, Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn)
    • Moderation and involvement with social networking (e.g., PatientsLikeMe, DiabetesMine)
    • Tele-monitoring / telemedicine
    • Electronic prescribing / EMR / PHR
    • Digital couponing / incentives
    • Gamification
    • Mobile applications
    • SMS
    • QR codes
    • Augmented reality

    But, I’m sure there are others…suggestions on what I’m missing?

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 149 other followers