In yesterday’s USA Today, there was an article by Rita Rubin called “Routine exams may need checkup“. There were some interesting points:
- Use of routine check-ups varies by geography – 28.9% in northeast, 20.5% in south, 19.7% in midwest, and 16.0% in west.
- 44.4M adults had a preventative health exam in each of the years 2002-2004 for an annual cost of $7.8B per year.
- 3/4 of the people had seen a doctor during the previous year when other preventative tests could have occurred.
I guess the questions here are:
- Are these people healthier in the long run?
- Was the other doctor a specialist and willing / able to do preventative care?
- What other costs were avoided (if any) through prevention?
- Who should have regular visits? (We can have a maintenance schedule for our car based on total miles. Why can’t we have a published schedule for humans? Or, why can we have indicators that trigger a visit?
- What do other countries do? Does it work?
- Why do you have to see an MD for preventative care? Couldn’t this be done at a MinuteClinic or with a Physician’s Assistant or a Nurse?

September 26, 2007 


No comments yet... Be the first to leave a reply!