Patient Responsibility in Readmissions

There has been lots of discussion over the past year about readmissions. With healthcare reform, it is estimated that we can save billions over the next 10 years by addressing this problem.

The new regulations will cut federal reimbursements for ALL discharges if hospitals have a greater than expected 30-day readmission rate. In FY 2013, the cut is one percent, but it goes up from there. I think everyone agrees this is a problem. I’m sure some would debate if this is the right metric, but it certainly is a tangible one.

For those of you that don’t know…In 2009, the NEJM published the article that set this in motion but you can see some of the discussions before this in this nice piece by Academy Health.

“Almost one fifth (19.6%) of the 11,855,702 Medicare beneficiaries who had been discharged from a hospital were rehospitalized within 30 days, and 34.0% were rehospitalized within 90 days; 67.1% of patients who had been discharged with medical conditions and 51.5% of those who had been discharged after surgical procedures were rehospitalized or died within the first year after discharge. In the case of 50.2% of the patients who were rehospitalized within 30 days after a medical discharge to the community, there was no bill for a visit to a physician’s office between the time of discharge and rehospitalization. Among patients who were rehospitalized within 30 days after a surgical discharge, 70.5% were rehospitalized for a medical condition. We estimate that about 10% of rehospitalizations were likely to have been planned. The average stay of rehospitalized patients was 0.6 day longer than that of patients in the same diagnosis-related group whose most recent hospitalization had been at least 6 months previously. We estimate that the cost to Medicare of unplanned rehospitalizations in 2004 was $17.4 billion.”

I think the interesting question here is what is the patient’s responsibility post-discharge.

You have several gaping issues:

  1. Health Literacy: 2/3rds of US adults over 60 have marginal or inadequate literacy skills and in one study, 81% of patients over 60 couldn’t even understand instructions on a prescription bottle. How are they supposed to navigate the system? (see this site for research on health literacy)
  2. Memory: Most patients forget what their physician or nurse tells them. I’d always heard that patients remember about 10% of what they’re told (see NYTimes article on this), but thanks to @trishatorrey, I found this study that showed that 40-80% of information is forgotten immediately. Now, some of this could be addressed by having companions at the encounter (see 2002 paper on this), but there have to be better ways to address this systemic issue.

I guess I would add these two together to equal understanding. How are patients who can’t read and don’t remember going to be successful at home.
This article suggests 12 ways to address readmissions. Additionally, our Chief Medical Officer at Silverlink Communications, Dr. Jan Berger, shared some of our research and also did a podcast on the topic last year.

We’ve always struggled with home monitoring. We can’t force the patient to take the pill. It’s also possible that they get prescribed a medication that they can’t afford and therefore don’t fill. They might have transportation issues and not be able to get to a pharmacy.

Another issue is access to a primary care physician for follow-up after discharge. One study estimated that one in five Americans had limited or no access to a primary care physician.

I don’t know about you, but these statistics scare me. You have people at high risk who are the primary cost drivers in our healthcare system, and they aren’t necessarily equipped or supported to be successful.

Now, we’re going to put the burden on the hospitals to fix this. I agree that it has to start there. The question I wonder is how do we link the patient to this somehow. Is there a way to make them responsible for avoiding readmissions by following the discharge instructions? Is there a way to incent them to be successful? What would we systemically have to do to enable them to be more accountable?

This will require a major effort to address physician and patient interactions, address the discharge process, create a follow-up process to education and monitor the consumer, and ultimately to create a system that provides the support they need to improve their health.

I think we all want the right thing, but I’m sitting here trying to figure out how it gets done.

One Response to “Patient Responsibility in Readmissions”

  1. George – thanks for the mention… truth is, I was interested in what you would have to say about the patient’s responsibility after discharge.

    If you think in terms of the assault on a patient’s body and psyche during a hospital stay (not in a criminal sense; rather, the entire reason s/he was there to begin withI, it’s easy to see why patients are so apt to forget what they are told. Even when we are at our healthiest and sharpest, we only remember a fraction of information that we’re given. Now add that to the fact that you are asking newly discharged patients to change routines and lifestyles, they may still be taking mind and pain-altering drugs, and you’ve got a perfect storm of reasons to forget.

    At the same time hospitals are being asked to improve/decrease readmission rates, a new career is taking shape. Numbers of private professional patient advocates and navigators are growing. More educational institutions are teaching courses and bestowing certificates. These advocates are hired and paid privately by the patient. Their goal is to facilitate the relationship between the patient and professional, in effect, allowing the patient to do his job – healing – while the advocate plays the role of “enforcer” for the professionals.

    The more enlightened hospital personnel, physicians, nurses and others, have begun to understand what a great resource these bedside advocates can be, regarding them as partners in the pursuit of helping their patients.

    Sadly, we also hear about medical personnel who get defensive, stand in the way of the patient-advocate relationship, and in effect nullify the positive effects an advocate can have.

    I suggest those who read this post and your linked article consider embracing the concept of private, professional patients’ advocates and navigators. While we don’t have data yet, it seems the numbers of readmissions would have to decrease – at no extra cost to the system itself.

    Win-win-win. It doesn’t get better than that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: