PBMI (Pharmacy Benefit Management Institute) put out its 14th report on employer satisfaction with their PBMs. Here are some of the highlights from the report:
- 275 employers representing 11.3M members responded.
- The overall rating was an 8.0 out of 10.0. (up from 7.9 in 2007)
- 6.7% of respondents perceived that their benefit costs were increasing more than others and ranked their PBMs lower. (perhaps a validation that trend management matters…hence the “battle” to show the lowest year-over-year trend to the street in the individual trend reports)
- PBMs were ranked on three factors – overall service and performance, delivering promised savings, and delivering promised services.
-
For the overall score:
-
Aetna (6.6), Argus (4.8), Innoviant (8.7), MedImpact (8.0), NMHC (7.5), and Prime Therapeutics (9.0) also were part of the report but had limited profiles due to a lower number of surveys being received.
- As far as I know, Prime doesn’t contract directly with employers but just through their BCBS owners. That would seem to disadvantage them in this survey.
- As far as I know, Prime doesn’t contract directly with employers but just through their BCBS owners. That would seem to disadvantage them in this survey.
- Employers can contract directly with PBMs or thru a managed care entity or buying group. Those that contracted directly ranked their PBMs higher (8.2 versus 7.6) which makes sense since they are more involved and more likely to be actively managing trend and having lower costs.
- This is validated by the fact that those with very aggressive intervention in benefit management rated their PBMs much higher (8.6 versus 7.1). About 33% considered themselves to be very aggressive.
- PBMs were rated the worst (7.2) for their disease management programs.
-
When looking at factors that were correlated with satisfaction there were a few surprises and a few no-kidding variables:
- I was surprised the member website, specialty pharmacy, and mail service pharmacy ranked low on the list of variables (i.e., less correlation).
- I was not surprised that account management ranked high and retail pharmacy network was low. In many cases, the networks are pretty similar. I would be interested to see how large employers ranked PBMs versus smaller employers since they probably get different levels of service.
-
Looking at the overall scores from 2004-2008:
- Caremark, Catalyst, Cigna, Express Scripts, and Medco all went up.
- Walgreens and Wellpoint went down.
Looking at the ranking of key factors:
Highest Ranked Function(s) |
Lowest Ranked Function(s) |
|
Aetna | Retail pharmacy network
ID card production |
Mail service pharmacy
Disease mgmt programs |
Argus | Retail pharmacy network
ID card production |
Formulary mgmt and rebates
Account mgmt |
Catalyst | Retail pharmacy network
Claims processing |
Disease mgmt programs
Mail service pharmacy |
Cigna | Account mgmt
Member services |
Delivering promised savings
Disease mgmt programs |
CVS Caremark | Retail pharmacy network
Claims processing |
Formulary mgmt and rebates
Disease mgmt programs |
Envision | Overall service and performance
Account mgmt |
Disease mgmt programs |
Express Scripts | Retail pharmacy network
ID card production |
Member services
Formulary mgmt and rebates Disease mgmt programs |
Innoviant | Formulary mgmt and rebates
Delivering promised savings |
Utilization and benefit mgmt consulting
Member website |
Medco | Retail pharmacy network
ID card production |
Utilization and benefit mgmt consulting
Mgmt reports Disease mgmt programs |
MedImpact | ID card production
Claims processing Retail network |
Formulary mgmt and rebates
Drug utilization mgmt Specialty pharmacy Delivery promised services |
NMHC | Retail network
Plan implementation and changes Specialty pharmacy |
Mail service pharmacy
Disease Mgmt programs |
Prime Therapeutics | ID card production
Retail network |
Disease Mgmt programs
Specialty pharmacy Formulary mgmt and rebates |
Walgreens | Retail pharmacy network
Mail service pharmacy |
Mgmt reports
ID card production Member website |
Wellpoint | Retail pharmacy network
Claims processing |
Acct mgmt
Disease mgmt programs Mgmt reports Utilization and benefit mgmt consulting |
So…my overall assessment is that it is a good report. It is limited by response and limited by the fact that there aren’t major differences between PBM scores (with a few exceptions). But, it certainly would give me some clues on what to expect, where to push, and how I should evaluate my PBM.
Hello,
This report gives a very vivid snapshot of where improvement challenges are for each PBM. I am researching Medco Health Solution, who has received numerous awards for outstanding services. However, this report updates the challenges that Medco has in meeting the needs of all within their value chain.
*Utilization and benefit mgmt consulting
*Mgmt reports
*Disease mgmt program
This is significant because this also illustrates a need for increased improvement in Content Management Systems, and eCommerce management.
I appreciate your research.
😉
MBA Student